Gender and James Bond

Perspective is very important, as I’ve been learning. With all the different students from different socioeconomic levels, cultures, and more, there’s something that half the class will be (unless it’s an all boys/girls school); half the class is female and half is male. Maybe I’m just stating the obvious, but it really makes a difference in how you teach. It’s important to note, as an aside, that along with race, you don’t want to be gender invisible. It’s another community with which we belong. It must be respected, but that isn’t to say that women and men aren’t each capable in their own right. Women mustn’t be ignored with regards to maths and sciences. But I, being male, must also understand how women see themselves. It’s an age old idea that men never ‘get’ women, that we can’t ever really understand, but I believe that false. Of course, I don’t know, but I can listen, be attentive and try to understand. It’s a time when students are developing so rapidly. We’re prepping them for their lives. They need to understand that gender can’t keep them down. That there are women scientists, famous, like Marie Curie, that have changed how we think about the world. But we’re still not a gender invisible world – it’s about opportunity, not outcome. We want to give everyone the chance to succeed, but it doesn’t mean that we treat everyone alike.

Girls will have to deal with their body image, boys will have to deal with their self image. I titled this ‘Gender and James Bond’ to give an open thought. Women have their heroes, men have theirs. James Bond is a prototypical male hero. Is he what it is boys want to emulate? Gender differences must be respected. But I still want to see the girls in my classroom want to be video game engineers, or the boys be elementary school teachers.

Tagged ,

One thought on “Gender and James Bond

  1. RLT says:

    I agree that like race, gender should not be invisible. I also believe the way we frame gender in our classrooms can have huge implications for how students learn to perceive differences and norms for gender roles and sexuality. With the way gender is often discussed in our society in strict dichotomies, one’s anatomical sex is generally expected to align with a particular gender and a particular sexuality. However, there are is so much fluidity and variation in each of these processes, which often do not align with our social norms. Making gender visible is simultaneously making alternative alignments visible as well; opening up a door for students to see completely different conditions of possibility for seeing and being in the world.

    Gender is different than one’s anatomical sex. One’s sex is biologically, physically defined. One’s gender is socially and culturally constructed. Gender roles are not static or universal; gender norms vary drastically between places and cultures. What it means to be masculine in America is very different than what it means to be masculine in India, for example. One’s gender does not always align with the “correct” anatomical sex either. Many people are trans-gender; some people are born inter-sex and do not fit in one anatomical category. Why not talk about these types of diversity and difference as well?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: